On 6 February 2009, the Moratorium Appointee of Glitnir hf. held a meeting of creditors in Reykjavik. The following presentation and Statement of Assets and Liabilities were presented at the meeting.
The following questions were raised during the meeting.
It should be noted that the Q&A below provides only a summary of the relevant provisions in effect during the winding up proceedings of Glitnir hf. It is not intended to and does not amount to legal or financial advice to any person. If any recipient is in doubt as to their legal position, they should seek independent legal advice.
On 22 November 2010, the Reykjavík District Court ruled that Glitnir hf., Reg. No. 550500-3530, Sóltún 26, Reykjavík ("the bank") was to be wound up as provided for in the general rules of Part B of Chapter XII of Act No. 161/2002, cf. however Points 3 and 4 of Temporary Provision V of the same Act, and with the legal effect arising from Point 2 of the same provision, as amended by Art. 2 of Act No. 132/2010. On 7 October 2008 the Financial Supervisory Authority (FME) had assumed the authority of the shareholders' meeting and appointed a Resolution Committee for the bank. According to an authorisation in Act No. 129/2008, cf. Act No. 21/1991, the bank was granted a moratorium by a ruling of the District Court on 24 November 2008. This moratorium has since then been extended three times, most recently on 13 August until 24 November 2010. Further extension was not authorised by law.
Act No. 44/2009, which entered into force on 22 April 2009, amended the nature and substance of a financial undertaking's moratorium. In accordance with Point 2 of Temporary Provision II of Act No. 44/2009 (Temporary Provision V of Act No. 161/2002), the provisions of the first paragraph of Art. 101, Art. 102, Art. 103 and Art. 103 a of Act No. 161/2002, as amended by the first paragraph of Art. 5 and Articles 6-8 of Act No. 44/2009, apply to the moratorium in the same manner as if the bank had been placed in winding-up proceedings with a court ruling on the date of the entry into force of the Act. It stated, however, that the winding-up proceedings should be referred to as a moratorium as long as this was authorised. Act No. 44/2009 furthermore stated that once such a moratorium expired, the undertaking should automatically, and without a specific court ruling being required, be regarded as being in winding-up proceedings according to general rules. A Winding-up Board was appointed for the bank by a decision of the Reykjavík District Court on 12 May 2009.
An invitation to creditors to lodge claims was published and the time limit for lodging claims was set as 26 November 2009. In addition to the invitation, the advertisement pointed out the time limits which had to be observed. Four meetings have been held on claims lodged and one more scheduled for 31 August 2011. At that meeting, presentation of decisions by the Winding-up Board on recognising claims against the bank is expected to be concluded.
Adoption of Act No. 132/2010, which came into effect on 17 November 2010, amended Act No. 161/2002, to the effect that before an undertaking's authorised moratorium expires, its Resolution Committee and Winding-up Board may jointly request that a court rule that the undertaking be placed in winding-up proceedings under general rules, if in the court's assessment the substantial requirements of Point 3 of the second paragraph of Art. 101 of the Act were satisfied. If such a request were acceded to by the court, those measures taken during the undertaking's moratorium, from the entry into force of Act No. 44/2009, would remain unaltered.
A request for such a ruling was submitted by the Resolution Committee and Winding-up Board and a ruling pronounced on 22 November 2010, on the basis of the Act as amended by Act No. 132/2010. The court found that the conditions of the Act for a ruling on winding-up proceedings were satisfied.
The bank's assets amount to approximately ISK 783 billion (based on the current prospects for recovery and the ISK exchange rate as of 30 September 2010) and its liabilities to approximately ISK 2,838 billion. The bank was therefore insolvent, in the assessment of the court, and its payment difficulties were unlikely to be temporary, cf. Point 3 of the second paragraph of 101. Art. 101 of Act No. 161/2002.
The court's decision furthermore confirms that, as provided for by law, the measures taken during the undertaking's moratorium following the entry into force of Act No. 44/2009, shall remain valid, which means, for instance, that the appointment of the bank's Resolution Committee and Winding-up Board remains in force, together with all those measures taken on the basis of Articles 101-103 and 103 a of Act No. 161/2002, cf. further Point 2 of Temporary Provision V of the Act. The ruling also confirms that the date of the entry into force of Act No. 44/2009, which is 22 April 2009, shall continue to serve as reference for determining priority of claims and other legal effect which is determined by the date a ruling is pronounced on winding-up.
Certain amendments were made to the Act on Financial Undertakings, No. 161/2002 (AFU), with the adoption of Act No. 78/2011 by the Althingi on 10 June 2011. Special attention is drawn to the fact that the Act includes an amendment to Point 3 of Temporary Provision V of the AFU (as adopted by Act No. 44/2009). The amendment will repeal this Point as of 1 January 2012, from which time all the tasks of Resolution Committees will be incumbent upon the Winding-up Boards of the financial undertakings concerned. This amendment will not have a significant impact on the day-to-day activities of Glitnir hf. – in winding-up proceedings